Please Let Your Interest Be Piqued

Please Let Your Interest Be Piqued Please Let Your Interest Be Piqued Please Let Your Interest Be Piqued By Maeve Maddox A reader received an email whose writer expressed this earnest wish: I hope this peeks your interest in advertising with us. This misspelling of pique is widespread: GNDs are here to connect you with things, we hope, will make you laugh. OR Peek your interest. ad for production company This book is fascinating and the author infuses the story with mystery and peaks your interest throughout. Amazon book review Now its time to choose what peeks your interest and develop your own personal spin on it. Thats the first step to being successful out here, so I hope you take this message seriously. tips for website development I hope the interview below peaks your interest.   blogger If you have never fished for a Peacock bass, we hope this peaks your interest enough to take your first venture fishing site Please look through these groups when you have a chance to see if there is something that peaks your interest. group networking site I hope my website peaks your interest, clears up any questions you have, and motivates you to become my patient. a dentists site I hope the following peeks your interest in continuing education. diving site Alright, lets face facts. Everybody loves a discount. It doesnt matter what product peeks your interest at a given moment, discount shopping is a favorite pass time of many. business site (Yep, this one is a veritable goldmine of misuse: Alright, doesnt, pass time) pique [pÄ“k] : verb To stimulate or provoke (a person) to action, esp. by arousing jealousy, etc.; to arouse (a feeling, esp. curiosity or interest). Its when pique is used in the sense of stimulating interest that it is most frequently misspelled as peek or peak. Other meanings of pique as a verb: pique: transitive verb. To wound the pride of, irritate, or offend; to make resentful. Ex. She deliberately tried to pique him by referring to his old girlfriend. pique: transitive verb used reflexively. To take pride in or congratulate oneself on. Ex. She piques herself on her good taste in home furnishings. As a noun pique can have these meanings: A quarrel or feeling of enmity between two or more people, countries, etc.; ill feeling, animosity. (A feeling of) anger, irritation, or resentment, resulting from a slight or injury, esp. to ones pride; offence taken. Now esp. in fit of pique. Ex. She quit the club in a fit of pique. Pique comes from the French verb piquer, to sting, to bite. Amateur book reviewers can probably continue misspelling pique with impunity. People trying to sell their services or a product, however, may want to learn to spell it correctly. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Spelling category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Program vs. ProgrammeHow to Play HQ Words: Cheats, Tips and TricksWord Count and Book Length

Vicarious Liability and the Close Connection Test Essay

Vicarious Liability and the Close Connection Test - Essay Example In Lister, the close connection test was first enumerated, finding that it was fair and just to find a close connection between the warden's sexual abuse of boys in his care and his duties as a warden. In other words, in this case, it found that the sexual abuse was inextricably woven in the duties of the warden, in that if the warden did not have the duties that he did   - checking up on children at night, alone – then the warden would not have the opportunity to sexually abuse the boys in his care. While this case was landmark, in that it put employers on the hook for intentional torts if the intentional torts arose because the duties of the employee essentially allowed the intentional tort to occur, this rule is not sufficiently bright line to encompass every situation. This principle would come into play in the case of Dubai Aluminum v. Salaam as well.   In the case of Dubai, the question was whether the firm would be liable for tortious acts of a member of the partner ship, as well as acts which would be considered to be equitable wrongs, such as the wrongs which were engaged in by Salaam in this case.   There are elements of agent and principle in this case, because Amhurst in this case would be considered to be an agent of the solicitor firm that he was a partner of.   However, in this case, it was held to be in the ordinary course of business, so both tortious wrongs and dishonest breaches would make the firm vicariously liable, therefore the principle should be on the hook for the agent's acts.... i case, it has long been a tenant for torts that it does not matter if something is expressly forbidden – typically the employer would still be liable for the actions of the employee. This principle was established in 1862 with the case of Limpus v. London General Omnibus Co.2 In the Limpus case, the company expressly told the driver of the omnibus not to race other omnibuses, yet the driver did this, and the omnibus overturned. However, the Limpus case is difficult to square with another case with similar facts, which found that if an employee does something that is not done with the knowledge or consent of the employer, this often means that the employer is not vicariously liable for the resulting negligence, which puts the onus on the injured party. The case is Conway v. George Wimpey & Co. Ltd.3 In the Conway case, the employee picked up the plaintiff, who was also an employee, and got into an accident. Since the employer did not know nor authorize the employee to do this, it was held that the employer was not liable. This seems to be an arbitrary case, in light of the principles set forth in Limpus. New Close Connection Test While the old test states that employers are generally no liable for their employees’ intentional acts, this has been evolving. Consider the case of Lister v. Hesley Hall Ltd.4 This apparently was one of the first times that employers are said to be liable for intentional acts of their employees. In Lister, the close connection test was first enumerated, finding that it was fair and just to find a close connection between the warden's sexual abuse of boys in his care and his duties as a warden. In other words, in this case, it found that the sexual abuse was inextricably woven in the duties of the warden, in that if the warden did not have